The question I think is what is the scope of copyright? I think historically it's about copying wholesale and redistributing for profit. That doesn't seem to b

The question I think is what is the scope of copyright? I think historically it's about copying wholesale and redistributing for profit. That doesn't seem to be what's happening here. If I read a publicly available article, and I create a summary, is that covered by copyright? If I get an AI to do that, is that somehow a 'special' type of summary that is covered? Can a provider of content somehow say "you may not use this for summarization"? Or apply other terms to my consumption if they are making it publicly available? I think the comparison is that if you ask a person something like: "Describe a power station?" They will likely have never been in a power station. They will be leaning heavily pieces of content they have consumed over the years, that presumably were copyrighted. If you create an article that describes a power station, have you breached copyright and should be sued by all the people over the years that have produced content about power stations? Is it suddenly different when a computer does it?