3 ms·
The problem with the "a lossy mathematical translation of its inputs is exactly like a person learns" arguments, even if courts don't find them ludicrous, is th
by notahacker 3y ago
The problem with the "a lossy mathematical translation of its inputs is exactly like a person learns" arguments, even if courts don't find them ludicrous, is that people absolutely can and are found guilty of trademark violations when they read thousands of pages of the LOTR and then write a fantasy novel full of Tolkein's character names for profit.
- veave 3y agoA fantasy novel with Tolkien's characters' names is an evident copyright violation regardless of how it was generated. That's not what's happening here.
- notahacker 3y agoNo, but the point is that OpenAI expects to be held harmless if someone uses its tools to violate trademarks [unlike if a human employee had been paid to read Tolkein and write a story about Gandalf and hobbits] because its not an OpenAI employee consciously doing it, but just a model that translates its given inputs If GPT is blameless doing some things because it's a deterministic model, not an agent, then the "it would be okay if a person was taught like this" defence doesn't apply in other areas
- NoZebra120vClip 3y agoCamelot! https://youtu.be/m3dZl3yfGpc https://youtu.be/m3dZl3yfGpc