3 ms·
While you are correct, it looks to me like tedunangst thought the numbers should have a bit length of 65,537 bits. That frakken huge. And not at all what this a
by delinka 15y ago
While you are correct, it looks to me like tedunangst thought the numbers should have a bit length of 65,537 bits. That frakken huge. And not at all what this article says.
He said "2^16+1 bits would be a very big number." That's 65,537 bits.
- tedunangst 15y agoActually, I'm saying it is not the bit length. But that seems to be the interpretation of the original comment.