4 ms·
Sounds like they have a single place to fix it, though, which is nice.
by JoBrad 3y ago
Sounds like they have a single place to fix it, though, which is nice.
- halostatue 3y agoYes. I think that the plugins should probably not be in $XDG_CONFIG_HOME, but in $XDG_DATA_HOME, if I’m reading correctly. But in part my point is that there's virtually no one who gets this correct either with Linux systems or macOS, which is what makes rants like the parent article so annoying.
- account42 3y agoPlenty of programs get $XDG_CONFIG_HOME and $XDG_DATA_HOME. The ones that don't are mainly lazy ports from Windows where that speration doesn't exist.