3 ms·

any idea how igzip's non-QAT path compares to zlib-ng[1]? [1] https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng

• jeffbee 3y ago
  It's fairly easy to check for yourself, but with local builds on a desktop CPU without QAT, compressing a 150MB JSON input, with igzip and minigzip (from zlib-ng) both producing a smaller output than gzip, gzip needs 1.187s, minigzip needs 0.665s, and igzip needs 0.313s.
• powturbo 3y ago
  You can use TurboBench [1] to benchmark igzip, zlib-ng and others. Download TurbBench from Releases [2] Here Some Benchmarks: - https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng/issues/1486 https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng/issues/1486 - https://github.com/powturbo/TurboBench/issues/43 https://github.com/powturbo/TurboBench/issues/43 [1] https://github.com/powturbo/TurboBench https://github.com/powturbo/TurboBench [2] https://github.com/powturbo/TurboBench/releases https://github.com/powturbo/TurboBench/releases