4 ms·
First off, HR exists to protect the company, not the employee. This should be rule #1 taught to young people entering the workforce: if you have a workplace con
by lopkeny12ko 3y ago
First off, HR exists to protect the company, not the employee. This should be rule #1 taught to young people entering the workforce: if you have a workplace concern, you cannot expect HR to bend over backwards to make you happy.
Your statements are emotional, and based on incomplete information. We have heard one side of the story and not the other.
It is also important to consider personal motives and incentives. Madison has much to gain by starting all this drama--in particular, a lot of visibility and a nice payout if she chooses to file suit against the company. I'm not saying her statements are false, but her statements are likely colored by this personal motive, and it's impossible to decipher the truth without hearing the other perspective.
- tadfisher 3y agoFirst point: understood, but this has nothing to do with the discussion. Second point: what did you find emotional in the text of my post? Third: point taken, but this is an impossible goalpost for anyone accusing their employers to be taken seriously. Moreover, there's nothing Madison could have written to avoid this suspicion, so I'm curious why you brought it up in response to my post. Did you mean to respond to someone else?
- psychphysic 3y agoAre you hoping the outcome of this discussion is that I think she should have continued working there?
- tadfisher 3y agoNo, only that you would place a bit less blame on workers for terrible workplace conditions. But why are you responding here? Is lopkeny12ko your alt account?
- psychphysic 3y agoNah just didn't figure there was any point re-treading the same territory. She is at least at fault for letting it to get the point of self harm, can we agree there?