3 ms·

How would that improve the abuse situation?

• yieldcrv 3y ago
  Very well, it would remove the site operators obligation and capability of removing anything, and their activity would no longer rely on appeasing a hosting provider at all
  • seanhunter 3y ago
    I'm not sure this theory would stand up if you actually tried it. If you just make something immutable storage my expectation would be the law would say "well it's up to you to make really sure you're entitled to store things in it before they go in", not "Well why didn't you say so? Oh well put anything you like in there in that case".
    • yieldcrv 3y ago
      what do you mean "tried it"? this reality already exists for a long time now in this system design, anonfiles wouldn't be hosting it, any Section 230 exception problem would be the IPFS node's problem and its not even about the legal aspect? its about working smarter not harder. what you are saying, to me, sounds similar to "this person made an online store to get around the zoning procedures of a brick and mortar store" never considering that they never ever considered making a brick and mortar store to begin with and would find the administration entirely unappealing and unrelated to fulfilling their vision