3 ms·
But if you don't want that to happen, you can just pay for the full-priced version. Why is it worse for the consumer to have both of those options, as opposed t
by idopmstuff 3y ago
But if you don't want that to happen, you can just pay for the full-priced version. Why is it worse for the consumer to have both of those options, as opposed to only the option where they can pay full price and not have the capabilities restricted?
- lastingwin 3y ago> But if you don't want that to happen, you can just pay for the full-priced version. I would never buy hardware from a company that locks the capacity down with software, so a Tesla (nor BMW) is not the car for me. > But if you don't want that to happen, you can just pay for the full-priced version. Consumers should have full access to their hardware, limiting that is limiting consumer rights. It's also bad because it encourages other companies to do the same and soon people will be left with no options.
- ryandrake 3y agoImagine if a car company decided that in order to save money, their factories would only produce 4-door cars. BUT, unless you paid a large extra monthly "Sedan fee", you would only be permitted to use the front two seats. Very few customers would accept this, for the same reason that these other software gates are unacceptable.