4 ms·
Would you consider Facebook preventing a user from posting to be "banning" or "censorship"? Even though they can still post on, say, Twitter?
by clucas 3y ago
Would you consider Facebook preventing a user from posting to be "banning" or "censorship"? Even though they can still post on, say, Twitter?
- constantcrying 3y agoNonsense analogy. The right one is not getting invited to a party and crying about getting banned.
- clucas 3y agoThe article indicates that they are actually removing books that are already in libraries. So it's more like I just got kicked out of the party and you're playing ridiculous word games saying I wasn't "banned" because there's a party down the street I can go to. Also, you didn't answer the question: would Facebook removing my ability to post be considered "banning"?
- constantcrying 3y ago>The article indicates that they are actually removing books that are already in libraries. Every library removes books. It is the most normal thing, my library has regular book sales where they let books go. If you want to call distributing books for low prices "banning them" I guess I can not help you.
- clucas 3y agoDo you see a difference between a library choosing to sell old books to make room for new ones, and being forced to remove books for political reasons? If not, then I guess I cannot help you. Good luck out there buddy.