3 ms·

Just this table tells you a lot: https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%

Just this table tells you a lot: https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F0e3aeb31-efd0-4575-bed1-33060f913eb1_4009x2780.jpeg https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_pr... My personal take is that occupy flew too close to the sun, and the ultra-rich worked together to completely saturate public discourse with identity politics issues so that no organized group of people ever thinks of taking the fight directly to the rich again.

theossuary 3y ago
Mine is Obama got elected and it led to a massive backlash by those who previously kept their opinions to themselves, believing they were the silent majority. They realized they weren't the majority and so no longer stayed quiet. It's always darkest before the dawn though
BestGuess 3y ago
problem is nobody blowin the whistle on that and it'd involve a lot of hands. Might be more like occupy made companies aware of an untapped market and they saturated it with virtue signaling trying to get that youth money instead. maybe bit of both. I just know I ain't heard anyone saying they got proof for the conspiracy part and the "companies virtue signaling" thing is a time honored tradition