5 ms·

hahaha so fitting... I've been struggling with an nginx configuration for two days now. I'm just about to try Caddy...

• adr1an 3y ago
  Caddyfile have easier syntax imho. Now, I wonder how does it compares to traefik..
  • c0wb0yc0d3r 3y ago
    If you are using caddy in k8s or docker (compose), you are wasting time. Traefik can be configured in almost every way via labels on pods/containers. It's also frustrating that you have to compile plugins into caddy to use them.
    • francislavoie 3y ago
      I disagree, Caddy works great in Docker. See https://caddyserver.com/docs/running#docker-compose https://caddyserver.com/docs/running#docker-compose, and CDP is a project that autoconfigures Caddy from labels https://github.com/lucaslorentz/caddy-docker-proxy https://github.com/lucaslorentz/caddy-docker-proxy. Regarding plugins, it's super simple to write a Dockerfile to add plugins, we ship a builder image variant that can be used to compile in any plugins you want.
  • jiehong 3y ago
    Caddy is more like a traditional web server. It does serve files while it’s not possible by default with traefik for example.