4 ms·
Will HTMX 2.0 have a smaller bundle size since you are removing things? I don't think HTMX is too big or anything but I have a love tiny libraries. And on tha
by bardak 3y ago
Will HTMX 2.0 have a smaller bundle size since you are removing things? I don't think HTMX is too big or anything but I have a love tiny libraries.
And on that note do you think that a smaller striped down version of HTMX is feasible like petite-vue is for vue
- recursivedoubts 3y agoI don't think the bundle size will shrink too much, especially if we include the morph-style merge, which is somewhat complicated yes, I think you could do a stripped down htmx that doesn't support a lot of the stuff htmx does, particularly life cycle events and more elaborate swapping mechanism for example, most response headers could be just done as the HX-Trigger response header + some client side scripting history support and form-value gathering is likewise a source of complexity and code that could be omitted or done less completely
- bardak 3y agoSounds like reasonable places to strip out stuff while keeping the fundamental features. I think the history support would be important enough to keep though.