> I wouldn't call "requiring drivers to not be using mobile phones" a "tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims" It's the mass surveillance that

> I wouldn't call "requiring drivers to not be using mobile phones" a "tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims" It's the mass surveillance that was called such. > It's for the good of everyone else on the road Nope, they too are subject to mass surveillance.