3 ms·
Those things are all worth $0 because they are the baseline for an employer. When accounting for these things in a total comp calculation, I do it something li
by KaeseEs 15y ago
Those things are all worth $0 because they are the baseline for an employer.
When accounting for these things in a total comp calculation, I do it something like this:
$comp = (1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5) - (6 + 7 + 8)
where
[1] Salary / cost of living index for area
[2] adjusted value of health care plan
[3] adjusted expected bonuses/profit sharing
[4] retirement contributions per annum
[5] dollar value of stock options given * chance of options
vesting at some worthwhile value (tricky to calculate for startups)
[6] expected hours per week over 40 * .025 * [1]
[7] estimated value of environmental and other stress
[8] cost in time, gas, stress, vehicle wear & tear,
inconvenience of commuting
Now, it may well be the case that other companies that you looked at had large negative values of 6 & 7, which makes Fog Creek look great in comparison, but I think that as a profession we're screwing ourselves in the long run if we think about uncompensated overtime as the norm and working normal hours as some sort of bonus :)
- zmj 15y agoThe comparison is the same whether you normalize to $0 or $X.
- KaeseEs 15y agoOh yes, the math certainly turns out the same. I guess I should have been clearer in the last paragraph, that normalizing to 0 or some positive dollar value is more of an issue of mental framing, as though it makes sense to use the type of calculation that I outlined as a guide it's not an infallible one but rather a tool to be used in decision making.
- InclinedPlane 15y agoNever working late or on weekends is decidedly not the norm in the tech industry. If you're lucky enough you work at a company that respects "work life balance" and only asks you to stay late or work on weekends on rare occasions. If you only have average luck then you'll be working 50 to 70 hours a week and at a minimum checking email on most weekends.