3 ms·

> toxic stuff I reckon let it all in, everything, all the toxic stuff. Then provide good filtering and tools for users to control the toxicity level to their l

• thinkingemote 3y ago
  "Toxic" is also the what almost everywhere in earth considers illegal, immoral and criminal. It's the worst things in the planet. Even the "uncensored" sites don't allow this evil.
  • exodust 3y ago
    What about a Facebook group who wanted to talk about "toxic content", and needed to post examples? Or a group of surgeons discussing traumatic injuries needing to share reference material to others in the group with their consent? Toxicity exists in the world, in nature, in society. How we deal with it when confronted by it, is what matters. Further more, one person's "evil toxic" is another's "slightly unpleasant content". Assigning moderators to pick and choose what stays or goes, is not sustainable. I've never watched a beheading video in my life, but I've certainly had the option to. I chose not to click play when one did the rounds years ago - the high profile US soldier one. That was my decision because I'm a big boy, all grown up and don't need a moderator to protect me from content.
• ketzo 3y ago
  but every successful social network has proven that the moderation is the product maybe you’re ok doing a bunch of manual filtering, but a huge percentage of users will churn the instant they see gore/porn/etc