3 ms·
> Unwillingness to admit they don't know what's happening, memes, resentment of criticism after malpractices. Let's assume that all doctors fit your descripti
by maxehmookau 3y ago
> Unwillingness to admit they don't know what's happening, memes, resentment of criticism after malpractices.
Let's assume that all doctors fit your description. (I don't agree, but let's go with it.)
What's the alternative? I just can't accept that the vast majority of medical professionals are ignoring a potential cure or refusing to accept that one for ME may exist because it might hurt their egos.
- PaulKeeble 3y agoWhich is how it's managed to persist because no one believes the victims. This is going to have it's me too moment at some point and people are going to be horrified how widespread it really is.
- swores 3y agoWhen it was first suggested that doctors/surgeons not washing hands & medical equipment between patients was harming patients, the majority of the medical community was up in arms calling the person who suggested it crazy and taking it as an attack on their professionalism. Being medical professionals doesn't educate them away from having the same human flaws and cognitive biases that we all are capable of. edit: I'd forgotten his name, it was Ignaz Semmelweis - see for example https://globalhandwashing.org/about-handwashing/history-of-handwashing/ https://globalhandwashing.org/about-handwashing/history-of-h... or https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2015/01/12/375663920/the-doctor-who-championed-hand-washing-and-saved-women-s-lives https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2015/01/12/3756639...
- codeTired 3y agoIt took some 20 years for this to become an accepted truth. I remember learning about a physician who helped his sister with child birth and she died. He was aware of the washing hands but ignored it. I believe he ended up committing suicide as he wasn’t able to cope with basically killing his sister due to his ignorance.
- jodrellblank 3y agohttps://old.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/15shhd4/who_was_vilified_in_their_time_but_in_hindsight/jwf2s9w/ https://old.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/15shhd4/who_was_... > "He didn't discover it, he was told by midwives over and over and over until he looked into it. Midwives at the hospital observed that when doctors delivered babies, mothers were at a higher risk. Any housewife knew that food would spoil faster if handled with dirty hands and they always used vinegar solutions to clean their hands, tools, and surfaces. Any housewife would do this and midwives did it because mothers and their babies are more important than pumpkin preserves. Only doctors never washed their grubby hands while it was a deeply ingrained habit in most midwives. Semmelweis listened to women. No wonder they locked him away." Which is uncited/unsupported, but back in the Black Death time of the 1660s: "The villagers established a system of boundary stones around the village’s periphery, boring holes into the rocks and leaving coins soaked in vinegar – they believed it acted as a disinfectant – in the holes. Merchants from surrounding villages would collect the money and leave bundles of meat, grains and trinkets in return." - https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20151026-the-sleepy-village-that-stopped-the-black-death https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20151026-the-sleepy-villa... And from the same Reddit thread: > "Oh again with this "before Germ Theory no one knew anything about disease!" bullshit. We always knew dead and dirty things caused disease. Dead animals for artillery ammo, dead animals buried by wells, leaving your swords in latrines. We also knew how copper and silver could help heal and prevent disease." So, it's not like Semmelweiss proposed Germ Theory, or was the first to observe a connection between death and disease, or between 'disinfectant' of some kind and reduced disease. And https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1299347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1299347/ says: > "(notably Alexander Gordon of Aberdeen) had shown that puerperal fever was contagious some 40 years before Semmelweis. The mortality rate in lying-in hospitals did not fall but rose after Semmelweis' treatise was published, and his ‘much-cited but seldom-read’ thesis is immensely long (over 500 pages) and so badly written that it is almost unreadable. [...] Semmelweis deserves to be remembered for his observation in 1847 that making medical students wash their hands in a disinfectant solution before going from the post-mortem room to the lying-in wards of the Vienna lying-in hospital, led to a fall in mortality due to puerperal fever from a very high level to a moderate level. [...] After his death in 1865, Semmelweis was totally forgotten, not only in Vienna but also in Hungary where he was born and to which he returned in 1850. It was not until the late nineteenth century that the introduction of Listerian antisepsis applied to obstetrics led to a steep fall in deaths from puerperal fever. Only then was Semmelweis' work recalled and his faults forgotten." Which is fine, he shouldn't be knocked, but how did it take 200 years for humans to decide to use the tools that were already internationally known (vinegar) to a large number of people (housewives, midwives) to avoid some kind of death-related contamination, on childbirth and hospital and post mortem scenarios? And why did it take a guy writing a 500 page near-psychosis rant? Was that low hanging fruit and if so, how much more of that is still in the world today?