4 ms·
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/995593 https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/995593 Analysis: Most research on PFAS harms is unpublicized ... sig
by myshpa 3y ago
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/995593 https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/995593
Analysis: Most research on PFAS harms is unpublicized
... significant links between PFAS exposure and risks of preterm birth, ovarian and breast cancers, osteoporosis, and gestational diabetes ...
https://news.ncsu.edu/2023/02/pfas-can-suppress-white-blood-cells-ability-to-destroy-invaders/ https://news.ncsu.edu/2023/02/pfas-can-suppress-white-blood-...
PFAS Can Suppress White Blood Cells’ Ability to Destroy Invaders
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.2c02765 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.2c02765
Outside the Safe Operating Space of a New Planetary Boundary for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)
https://phys.org/news/2023-05-secret-industry-documents-reveal-makers.html https://phys.org/news/2023-05-secret-industry-documents-reve...
Secret industry documents reveal that makers of PFAS 'forever chemicals' covered up their health dangers
https://apnews.com/article/science-climate-and-environment-government-politics-1997041096d6fc84edde97cf16f72bce https://apnews.com/article/science-climate-and-environment-g...
EPA: ‘Forever chemicals’ pose risk even at very low levels
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/may/12/pfas-forever-chemicals-societal-cost-new-report https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/may/12/pfas-for...
Societal cost of ‘forever chemicals’ about $17.5tn across global economy – report
- inciampati 3y agoWhat about scientific studies? These are all from the press.
- chaosite 3y agoThe first 3 links are press releases by an academic PR office publicizing a recently published paper. They literally link to the scientific paper they reference, and being the second step in the science news cycle (https://phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174 https://phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174), their representation of the contents of the paper is usually fairly accurate. This is not a valid criticism of the GP. Edit: The second link is actually a paper.
- inciampati 3y agoApologies, I was looking for DOIs and I should have just said it.
- wgjordan 3y agoHere are direct links to the primary sources mentioned. Four scientific studies, an EPA health advisory, and a report from a non-profit organization. [1] https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-023-00997-6 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-023-00997-6 [2] https://doi.org/10.1080/1547691X.2023.2176953 https://doi.org/10.1080/1547691X.2023.2176953 [3] https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c02765 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c02765 [4] https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.4013 https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.4013 [5] https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/drinking-water-health-advisories-pfoa-and-pfos https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/drinking-water-health-advisories-pf... [6] https://chemsec.org/reports/the-top-12-pfas-producers-in-the-world-and-the-staggering-societal-costs-of-pfas-pollution/ https://chemsec.org/reports/the-top-12-pfas-producers-in-the...
- inciampati 3y agoThank you!