3 ms·
Nothing is perfect. A constitution is there as a mechanism to make it harder to pass weird and perverse laws that are inconsistent with the state's values. Bu
by midoridensha 3y ago
Nothing is perfect. A constitution is there as a mechanism to make it harder to pass weird and perverse laws that are inconsistent with the state's values. But if the voters keep electing people who work to weaken the constitution or to amend it (or replace it altogether), it'll happen eventually.
A lot of things in modern democracies, or even older ones (like the US's federal constitution) are really there to act as roadblocks and prevent a simple majority of voters from electing some shitty politicians who make wild changes in the law. It's a bit like that scene in "Alien" when Sigourney wants to blow up the Nostromo, and has to go through a ridiculous process of flipping switches and raising and turning and lowering some metal cylinders inside a control panel in the floor: blowing up the ship doesn't really need all that stuff, but it's just there to make it hard to do quickly and easily.
- chris_wot 3y agoThe principles of Parliamentary Sovereignty, Rule of Law, Democracy and Internationalism are all mechanisms used to also ensure that laws must be consistent with the state's values.
- CameronNemo 3y agoI dunno. Parliamentary systems are supremely malleable. Look at what is happening in Israel.
- midoridensha 3y agoI don't think Israel, a theocracy, is representative of parliamentary systems. Almost all of Europe is governed by parliamentary systems, and most of the EU countries are fine.
- anonymous_sorry 3y ago>A lot of things in modern democracies, or even older ones (like the US's federal constitution) are really there to act as roadblocks and prevent a simple majority of voters from electing some shitty politicians who make wild changes in the law I wonder if this creates a feeling among voters that it is OK or even desirable to vote for batshit politicians, because they'll be constrained by the constitution and "nothing ever changes anyway". And then those politicians decry the constraining checks and balances as the "deep state" or "the blob".
- CrazyPyroLinux 3y agoThe "deep state" was never meant to be part of the checks and balances; it was meant to be prevented by such. Yet Hobbes's Leviathan grows unchecked.