4 ms·
Did you read the methodology that was used to come up with the "photo"? It's a far cry from just shifting the spectrum a bit to the visible range.
by claytongulick 3y ago
Did you read the methodology that was used to come up with the "photo"?
It's a far cry from just shifting the spectrum a bit to the visible range.
- perrygeo 3y agoAny digital or analog photo is a far cry from our biological signal processing. Yes, their methodogy used lots of signal manipulation to produce the photo. Just like an RGB digital camera does. Just like analog film. Just like our rods, cones and visual cortex. Which one is the "correct" way to process the signal? What you're claiming is that "photos" have privileged scientific status over other types of sensors/processing hardware. Someone else might claim that only biological sensors have privileged status. But neither claim is scientific since it cannot be verified. In lieu of a testable hypothesis, we have to conclude that all frequencies of electromagnetic radiation and all mathematically-valid signal processing techniques are fair game for empirical observation.