I experienced this the other day. The argument was about the rules for who can be US vice-president. One side was using the US constitution as the ultimate deci

I experienced this the other day. The argument was about the rules for who can be US vice-president. One side was using the US constitution as the ultimate decider. The other side was using a French 14 hundred definition of who can be vice-president. This was in the US. These types of arguments are happening regularly. If people are picking their own rule book, how can we ever come to an agreement?