3 ms·
Since I don't drive, if I want to get somewhere that doesn't have public transport going there, are you suggesting I should not be able to go there?
by BrianHenryIE 3y ago
Since I don't drive, if I want to get somewhere that doesn't have public transport going there, are you suggesting I should not be able to go there?
- PrimeMcFly 3y agoCan you quote the part of my comment that you think shows I am saying something like that?
- BrianHenryIE 3y agoSeriously? > Several states grant some right for cyclists to travel in lanes with cars, but in practice that's absurd. Which I'll translate for you, from you: > ~It's absurd for cyclists to use the roads So, how do I get to where I need to go?
- PrimeMcFly 3y agoYour translation is off. It's not absurd for bikes to use roads, it's absurd to get in the way of and mix with car traffic as though they were a car. > So, how do I get to where I need to go? Take bike paths, sidewalks, backroads etc. Or lobby your city for better bike infrastructure. Or accept the risk of the increased likelihood that you will end up a statistic.
- MerelyMortal 3y agoTechnically the translation is off. But you're probably being downvoted because others don't think that is reasonable. Ideally both types of vehicles should be able to get along, but the reality is that both types of drivers have irrational emotions.