3 ms·
A space program is a lot more expensive than either. Why do we have one?
by fooker 3y ago
A space program is a lot more expensive than either.
Why do we have one?
- bryanlarsen 3y agoThe NASA budget is $25B. It'd cost a lot more than $25B to put in proper bike infrastructure in every city.
- brailsafe 3y agoThat's why there are multiple levels of government with their own funding sources
- nimbleplum40 3y agoAnd the interstate highway system cost $550B (in todays dollars) to construct. Useful things are often expensive…
- zht 3y agounless if a space program came out of city budgets I am unsure why this is relevant
- fooker 3y agoDeveloping self driving cars don't come of city budgets
- nimbleplum40 3y agoI don’t follow. A space program isn’t really relevant to transportation…
- fooker 3y agoAnd developing self driving cars aren't that relevant to bike lanes.
- nimbleplum40 3y agoI was responding to the original comment. But they’re both forms of urban transportation that share the same infrastructure.