4 ms·
Ok I'll be the odd person out and say this is actually sort of reasonable. I only know this because I've worked on large batch billing systems before. (Yes on a
by exabrial 3y ago
Ok I'll be the odd person out and say this is actually sort of reasonable. I only know this because I've worked on large batch billing systems before. (Yes on a mainframe too. Gen-Z check your iWatch for a pulse).
In the US, nearly any given city, un-incorporated area, county, region, state, can assess a tax for services. These things are like fleas. They're hard to track down and full compliance is nearly impossible, and the if-ands-butts when they apply and when they come-go is an added challenge, especially if they apply like to persons visiting the area.
I'm guessing whats happening is most counties are like "our population is X" and you can estimate the tax billed owed on that, and that's good enough for government work. Customizing a billing system to individualize and print the $0.04 is an enormous expense for literally no benefit to the consumer.
Again, just a guess.
Now ISPs, many of them being entrenched monopolies, obviously hide behind their finances to rip consumers off. I'm not advocating for that. The real problem is a lot of these municipalities _invited_ the Comcasts of the world in at steep discounts, and now are crying that there is no competition (Because nobody else can compete profitably). That is another issue, but I don't think printing an extra $0.04 on your bill is going to make a lick of difference.
- kibwen 3y agoThat doesn't change the fact that they somehow manage to figure out the fees at billing time. If they need my street address in order to determine the eventual fees, that's fine. But for them to say that it just can't be done is to piss on me and tell me that it's raining.
- 0cf8612b2e1e 3y agoCapitalism is predicated upon consumers being able to make a rational purchasing decision. If true costs are hidden, there is no way for someone to assess the product before them. Maybe the fees are an irrelevant $.04 today, but that could turn into a hidden $6.99 tomorrow
- eli 3y agoThe rule at issue is about "discretionary" fees -- not ones imposed by a government. What's happening in many cases is states or localities are requiring the telco to comply with some law (e.g. to have functional 911) and the telcos get away with misleading customers into thinking their cost of doing business is your government tax.
- solraph 3y agoThat sounds like the ISPs problem, not the customers.