3 ms·
Well, I did not use tribalism with a negative connotation. And as far as I understand, their "assemblies" are pretty much reserved to members of their ethnicit
by hutzlibu 3y ago
Well, I did not use tribalism with a negative connotation.
And as far as I understand, their "assemblies" are pretty much reserved to members of their ethnicity/tribe. Thats why it is more tribalist to me, than anarchist, which is usually rather internationalist.
- TotalCrackpot 3y agoThey seem to have closed borders which is not typically considered anarchists indeed. About assemblies - that's fine, anarchists postulate freedom of association so you don't have to let random people from outside inside your structures, still they seem to be some inspiration to the rest of residents of Chiapas and in practice there is nothing that could stop them from fighting for their self-determination too.