> People are paid to deliver features and yet the forums are full of why this and that is annoying in React (...) Online forums dedicated to frameworks are fil

> People are paid to deliver features and yet the forums are full of why this and that is annoying in React (...) Online forums dedicated to frameworks are filled with questions on what the framework does and how it works. No news there. What did you expect? > Knowing how to architect your app remains important, and once you know it, it's trivial. For those who refuse to learn it because they deem it a gargantuan task, frameworks will keep trying to provide a "generic" solution, but a "generic" solution is by necessity overcomplicated, overengineered, and bloated, because it's trying to address EVERYONE's concern and specific needs. I'm sorry, you typed a lot of words to actually say nothing. So you don't use all features provided by a tech stack. So what? That is not bloat. Writing software is not a game of bingo. Also, reinventing the wheel when a fully working and tested wheel is already available is a very dumb mistake and a fundamental failure in the decision-making process. > React started with the promise of simplicity, and being a library, not a framework. Somewhere along the line this ideal was lost, this happens often. I don't think this is remotely true in any way. Undoubtedly React greatly simplifies the work of putting together working and full-featured SPAs. The concept is so good and so extensively proven that React is already being used to develop native GUIs in desktop applications. Your comments reads as if you're tilting at a React windmill. It's ok if you like vanilla JavaScript, but you're not being honest with yourself if you're failing to understand what problems React solves, how well Reacts solves them, and why the whole world has basically standardized around it.