2 ms·
EDIT: no longer Flagged by me. Flagged because this is just going to devolve into arguing. I doubt there's going to be much insightful conversation happening i
by bloopernova 3y ago
EDIT: no longer Flagged by me.
Flagged because this is just going to devolve into arguing. I doubt there's going to be much insightful conversation happening in this thread.
HN works because of the good decisions made. I wish people would stop try to destroy that.
- johnnyanmac 3y agoOn the other hand, I feel a technical audience should understand the importance of peer review. I don't like the idea of stifling conversation because "trolls will ruin it". Yes, you can apply that as a blanket deflection of any sort of decision. >HN works because of the good decisions made. from who's perspective?
- theultdev 3y agoI wish people would stop trying to destroy a conversation that others clearly want to have. I don't see any arguing going on here, just a healthy debate about free speech balancing while still deploying spam blocking techniques. This is a political and a technical issue. It's a fascinating problem with no perfect solution (yet?)
- bloopernova 3y agoUnderstood. I've skimmed over the thread and I admit I was wrong. For what it's worth, thank you for convincing me to take a second look and remove the flag. I do see that other(s) have flagged it though.