3 ms·

Man, do I have good news for you! You don't have to wait, we're already tracking temperature vs solar activity: https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/189/

• blindriver 3y ago
  That "solar activity" graph completely contradicts the graph in the article. I'll wait for better data.
  • ben_w 3y ago
    Given the graph starts in 1880: I see you, like myself, are anticipating substantial life extension technology.
  • GeoAtreides 3y ago
    Ah, you're a tricky client! The article has a graph of sunspot numbers, not irradiance! So nothing contradicts anything, but that's not really important! We also have graphs of sun activity vs temperature! http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/solact.html http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/solact.htm... But wait! There's more! Here is a graph of sunspot numbers since 1880: https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/couldnt-sun-be-cause-global-warming https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/couldnt-sun... It doesn't feature the global temperature, so it's not perfect, we're sorry! We're very sorry! But it's clearly constant and doesn't exhibit the hockey stick shape of global temperature.
  • cashsterling 3y ago
    Lol... they match up fine for solar activity from 2012 to 2020. This sounds like: "the data doesn't support my thesis so I'll wait for 'better' data. What does 'better data' mean? Data that supports my thesis... thank you very much."
• wredue 3y ago
  Time to cancel NASA!