2 ms·
I believe: http://literateprogramming.com/ http://literateprogramming.com/ and the publication of: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/499934.Computers_Types
by WillAdams 3y ago
I believe:
http://literateprogramming.com/ http://literateprogramming.com/
and the publication of:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/499934.Computers_Typesetting_Volume_B https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/499934.Computers_Typeset...
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1746886.Computers_Typesetting_Volume_D https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1746886.Computers_Typese...
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/8981752-physically-based-rendering https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/8981752-physically-based...
would argue against this.
Esp. see: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/112245.Literate_Programming_Volume_27_ https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/112245.Literate_Programm...
- toby- 3y agoThe article does mention Knuth, the author of three of the books you mention.
- WillAdams 3y agoI think it would be more accurate to say the "most code is not literature" since it is not documented in a fashion which makes it readable --- and it would be more interesting if the examination/re-writing of the code was done in a literate fashion. The largest project I ever did (typesetting back-end for an on-line interactive ad design system) was done as a literate program, and over the course of years of maintenance was far easier to work with than other smaller code bases which I hadn't taken the effort to so structure and document. Arguably, I need to re-work my present project thus: https://willadams.gitbook.io/design-into-3d/ https://willadams.gitbook.io/design-into-3d/