4 ms·

I used FreeBSD till early 2000's, when Linux had become a better choice. I've installed Chromium on FreeBSD 12 and it was impossible to enable to antialised fo

I used FreeBSD till early 2000's, when Linux had become a better choice. I've installed Chromium on FreeBSD 12 and it was impossible to enable to antialised fonts, no matter what I had tried. Generally, it is worse as a desktop system than more even obscure OpenBSD.

red-iron-pine 3y ago
> Generally, it is worse as a desktop system than more even obscure OpenBSD. there is a very polished, BSD-based desktop available, albeit at a fairly high price compared to FOSS alternatives
- znpy 3y ago
  MacOS?
von_lohengramm 3y ago
> Generally, it is worse as a desktop system than more even obscure OpenBSD. This is just untrue.
doublerabbit 3y ago
> Generally, it is worse as a desktop system than more even obscure OpenBSD. Only because you couldn't get AA with chromium? FreeBSD is my daily driver, stable as a brick. Everything just works. Never going back.
- rahen 3y ago
  I run NetBSD as a desktop and AA also works with Chromium. This looks strange.