4 ms·
He did not. Doubled down on his response on the forum. The crux seems to be in him not realising that he not liking a product is not enough to make it the only
by guax 3y ago
He did not. Doubled down on his response on the forum.
The crux seems to be in him not realising that he not liking a product is not enough to make it the only point and everything moot.
They misplaced the card they received to test with. Decided to not wait and reshoot and made a terribly unprofessional video justifying that the product premisse was already bad.
The product is fine, its expensive but its niche and unique, it would be totally ok for them to conclude with something like:
"I cant recommend this to replace any block in the market, there are cheaper and equally performant alternatives. But, none looks like this or work like this, so some of you might be interested in knowing that you get what its advertised for a very steep price."
He of all people, building a pool water cooling and other insanity should know that people might like to spend more money to have something fun, different or unique.
- preisschild 3y agoNot only did he double down, he lied about it. He said that they already started refunding Billet before GNs video, but GN asked Billet, and it turns out they did ghost them until after GN released the video.
- yndoendo 3y agoThis is like reviewing a P2 screw driver while testing it on P1 screws only while demanding that the P2 sucks. There is now way I can respect the work Linux Tech Tips does anymore. To be fair, I only used them occasionally to keep up to date on new hardware.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]