This article makes no sense to me, because right to repair is not necessarily about the customer repairing their own stuff, but somebody else other than the man

This article makes no sense to me, because right to repair is not necessarily about the customer repairing their own stuff, but somebody else other than the manufacturer repairing it - it can be an independent repair business or a shop with the necessary safety measures and qualifications. I suspect this article was sponsored by the anti-right-to-repair lobby...