3 ms·
Your overuse of algorithm-generated images is very cringy.
by karpour 3y ago
Your overuse of algorithm-generated images is very cringy.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- raincole 3y agoUnrelated AI-generated images make me close a tab so fast.
- naillo 3y agoThe probability that the article itself is written by GPT-4 becomes so much greater if that's the case too.
- zackproser 3y agoI can assure you this post was not. I even remember why I wrote it! If you take a look at some of my previous posts you'll see I've experimented thoroughly with integrating GenAI services into my workflow, but I don't like using generated text. I'd rather write the article myself. I find myself more likely to take some generated code as a starting point or talk through a thorny technical issue with GPT4 until the path forward is clear in my mind.
- naillo 3y agoI believe you that this article wasn't written by generative AI. I'm not really accusing you of either. I'm just saying that the conditional probability that an article is AI written given that the images are AI generative is much higher than if it doesn't have those (mostly since on average such authors have likely played with both if they've played with one of them).
- zackproser 3y agoYep, totally makes sense!
- n_ary 3y agoAt least, I find it similar to(or slightly tolerable with images disabled) the previous emoji packed sentence trend.
- dorkwood 3y agoOne at the top is usually fine. Ten or so is a bit excessive.
- __ryan__ 3y agoWhat is it about it that makes you feel this way?
- zackproser 3y agoThanks for the feedback! I disagree, personally, and quite enjoy them, hence why I've included them. I love them, myself and - this part is really going to bother you - I'm working on an open source project to help me generate them with even greater efficiency: github.com/zackproser/panthalia But yeah: my content is definitely not for everyone!