Seems like an excessively conservative approach imo. If advocating for tool changes wasn't important sometimes, I don't think it would be relevant to cite some

Seems like an excessively conservative approach imo. If advocating for tool changes wasn't important sometimes, I don't think it would be relevant to cite some much slower process. Sometimes the tools suck, and sometimes you need to improve that situation, ideally in a gradual fashion. Sometimes they're passable, and there are other priorities, but usually tools start showing their rust eventually. I also think it's extreme to say it's aged "very" poorly. It provides a relatively productive way to express UI as composable state machines, and now it just has a solid ecosystem of viable competitors.