But you said orbital resonance between two planets will eject a third from its orbit. Just... no. A physicist would never make a claim like "an orbital resonanc

But you said orbital resonance between two planets will eject a third from its orbit. Just... no. A physicist would never make a claim like "an orbital resonance between Earth and Venus would disrupt Mercury" without a study to back it up. As an aside, it is the the fact that you say things like this with confidence really sets me off - people who do know what they're talking about are careful to point out speculation. Our intuitions don't map so well to borderline non-newtonian complex interactions. Only a fool would claim otherwise. You can't just show up to another field and use your observations and a wikipedia page to make good points. I'd be happy to recommend astrophysics literature if you want. Your uses of words "stable", "unstable" and "consonant" and "dissonant" are the key here - I have no idea what "stable" means in music theory, and I don't think you'd know what I mean when I say "metals", because every field has its own jargon. But I'm not trying to make a point about music, whereas you are trying to make a point about astrophysics. Fine - but you can't expect to be understood or paid attention to if you don't learn the jargon and the underlying physics.