This thread is going nowhere, you're both in denial: - <example of bad predictions> It has to come from actual scientists! - <example from Hansen> I don't bel

This thread is going nowhere, you're both in denial: - <example of bad predictions> It has to come from actual scientists! - <example from Hansen> I don't believe you, you must be making it up. - <citation> Still can't believe it, primary sources only! - <citation of another false claim by the same scientist, in his own words, from the source you selected> What about all the other predictions! You're paraphrasing! Sciency sounding! Creationists! IPCC! You don't seem to know how to respond to counter-examples that disprove your initial belief so keep falling back on a grab-bag of memetic clichés that don't actually apply here. What does creationism have to do with anything? What is "sciency sounding" about something as basic as temperature? How can I be paraphrasing anything when the words are a direct quote from his written testimony to Congress? Go look up his Scenario A "business as usual" predictions and see for yourself how far off it is from even today's adjusted-upwards temperature record. The gap is massive.