3 ms·
Fortunately, we live in a adversarial legal system, where each side in a courtroom makes a self-serving argument, as opposed to a balanced one, and its up to th
by vkou 3y ago
Fortunately, we live in a adversarial legal system, where each side in a courtroom makes a self-serving argument, as opposed to a balanced one, and its up to the jury and judge to figure out a balanced path that reconciles those self-serving viewpoints.
(And if we're going to limit rights to people who can understand complicated issues and make balanced arguments about them, an awful lot of 85-yer olds are going to be in a bit of a pickle. I agree, though, that it would be interesting to explore excluding anyone who, say, needs to wear diapers from both political and legal processes... There is a minimum voting age, after all, why not a maximum one?)
- TheCleric 3y agoExactly. If the 5 year old can understand "These people are making climate change worse and will make the world hotter when I grow up." (which is in the capacity of most 5 year olds) then it's perfectly fine. There are adults who don't understand intricacies of their positions, why should a 5 year old?
- t0bia_s 3y agoHow could individual make climate change worse?