3 ms·
> A landowner could have a large family, and his vote represented the collective interests of the entire family. Then why didn't they let the lady of the house
by triceratops 3y ago
> A landowner could have a large family, and his vote represented the collective interests of the entire family.
Then why didn't they let the lady of the household have the sole vote? Wouldn't her vote also represent the collective interests of the entire family?
- datavirtue 3y agoThey can't be trusted. They are like children. God put the man over his household. The list goes on. This stuff is ingrained in a lot of people. Maybe progressivism is the fad.
- NoZebra120vClip 3y agoWho is "they"