> (Please note that while the word “Scrum” has been kept intact in the quoted comments, the reader should make no distinction between Scrum and Agile. The corpo

> (Please note that while the word “Scrum” has been kept intact in the quoted comments, the reader should make no distinction between Scrum and Agile. The corporate world makes no distrinction, and we should not give others the defense of blameshifting to a framework) The first few I see are specifically about aspects of the scrum framework, even if the word used is "agile". The correct response to those issues at least, would be too highlight that there are other versions of agile that aren't scrum and advocate for trying those instead - which is the exact opposite approach. . Also the point of agile is flexibility rather than efficiency or throughout. Favoring flexibility means delivery erring on the side of overcommunication and is inherently prone to micromanagement. Addressing that issues is also not served by telling people that can ignore everything if they're one of the few that knows that agile isn't limited to just scrum.