>it's that they'll cause a lot of economic devastation to people who make a living through labor requiring skill and knowledge, especially future generations of

>it's that they'll cause a lot of economic devastation to people who make a living through labor requiring skill and knowledge, especially future generations of skilled labor. If a task can be completed satisfactorily by an automated computer program, was the task really "skilled labor"? I ask this sincerely, because some of the occupations being replaced/evicted (eg: copywriting) were clearly given more skill value than they should have.