3 ms·
I am completely fine with calling past dubious design choices. This isn't one of them. That was your labeling, provided with no evidence or reasoning, not mine,
by josevalim 3y ago
I am completely fine with calling past dubious design choices. This isn't one of them. That was your labeling, provided with no evidence or reasoning, not mine, and that's what I was criticizing.
The Lisp-1 and Lisp-2 discussion is several decades old, with many discussions arguing the benefits of one over the other. The article highlights some of those trade-offs, which should be clear if someone is willing to get past superficial syntax notes.
However, given how intent you are on putting words in my mouth and on distorting contrasting opinions as white lies, let's call it a day.
- ajkjk 3y agoAh, I didn't mean to say your take was a white lie. The white lie I referred to was the implicit claim in the article, that it had to be this way, instead of that it's correcting something unfortunate.
- ralphc 3y agoThis reminds me of when Paul Graham asked a question about Python and someone said they weren't going to do their homework for them.