3 ms·
> Previously, I opted not to give my rationale for the hypothesis in case someone had any reason to refute it. Maybe I misunderstand but it sounds like you are
by ramblenode 3y ago
> Previously, I opted not to give my rationale for the hypothesis in case someone had any reason to refute it.
Maybe I misunderstand but it sounds like you are saying that you thought the reasoning for your hypothesis would not be accepted, you didn't want others to critique its potential problems, but you wanted people to read it anyway.
What value does it add to the discussion then?
- dr_dshiv 3y agoWell, it would help explain why these near resonances could be more valuable to the solar system’s stability than perfect resonances. Meaning they likely aren’t coincidental, despite not being perfect.