3 ms·
That's actually a glitch...her salary was $24,694, and ProPublica ‘s website somehow picked that up as $24,694,000, which that website cited. https://projects.
by boeingUH60 3y ago
That's actually a glitch...her salary was $24,694, and ProPublica ‘s website somehow picked that up as $24,694,000, which that website cited.
https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/201864550 https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/201...
- tonymillion 3y agoThanks for clarifying, I looked at the site from GP and I WTF’ed loud enough to wake my dog.
- bombcar 3y agoSee you wouldn't have that problem if you had a companion Rabbit, for the low low price of all your money.
- david_allison 3y agoIt shows $24,693,084 in the filings for 2018. Definitely inaccurate data
- callalex 3y agoWow they didn’t even bother to fact check the top 2 data points? ProPublica is a useless joke.
- jasomill 3y agoThe $24,693,084 figure accurately represents the original IRS filing[1], which is all ProPublica claims to be doing. [1] https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/cor/201864550_201812_990EZ_2019110516821631.pdf#page=2 https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/cor/201864550_201812_990E...
- neilv 3y agoSounds like Holly Lang and the Companion Rabbit Network should be talking to lawyers. (Preferably a lawyer who cuddles companion rabbits only to counterbalance their apex predator shark side, which comes out when extracting every penny of compensation that is due to clients who have been defamed.)