3 ms·
What, something like this? $ ping 64:ff9b::8.8.8.8 PING 64:ff9b::8.8.8.8(64:ff9b::808:808) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 64:ff9b::808:808: icmp_seq=1 ttl=1
by Dagger2 3y ago
What, something like this?
$ ping 64:ff9b::8.8.8.8
PING 64:ff9b::8.8.8.8(64:ff9b::808:808) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 64:ff9b::808:808: icmp_seq=1 ttl=113 time=8.75 ms
Seems like we already have something very much like that.
- BizarroLand 3y agoYes, but most people don't even have access to that right now. https://www.akamai.com/internet-station/cyber-attacks/state-of-the-internet-report/ipv6-adoption-visualization https://www.akamai.com/internet-station/cyber-attacks/state-... Making a new system that will automatically go live, work transparently to the current system and is on by default as hardware is updated and replaced is a strong pathway forward to unsnarl the internet when you're stuck in this predicament. Pedantics won't solve the problem and just ensure that nothing ever gets better.
- Dagger2 3y agoThat would be a strong pathway forward indeed, if it were possible. Is it? Because your suggestion so far was something v6 already did, and it wasn't good enough for you. Computers are the worst pedants in existence, so if it's not possible, you're not going to be able to do it... which means that not only is it not a useful suggestion, but it drains time and energy away from doing things which will work.