How is it flawed? I state that I am doing the calculation for cars. How can not including trucks be a flaw in calculating the value for cars? >To the point: 73

How is it flawed? I state that I am doing the calculation for cars. How can not including trucks be a flaw in calculating the value for cars? >To the point: 73% of what exactly? 80% of total emissions? 40%? 10%? I do not understand what you are asking. What are all these percentages? The number I calculated was an estimate of the decrease in carbon emissions if you replaced all gas cars with EVs in the US.