> We could at any point during the transition decide that now we are Go 2, which might be good marketing. Among the (entirely?) dev-oriented consumers of Golan

> We could at any point during the transition decide that now we are Go 2, which might be good marketing. Among the (entirely?) dev-oriented consumers of Golang would the shininess of "2.0" really outweigh the "ugh documentation is going to get harder to find" and "ugh I now need to increase my auditing of dependencies" and other similar fatigue? Is Google universally good at marketing?