4 ms·
1. A countervailing meta-analysis does not mean it's "debunked" 2. A theory being debunked does not mean it's "just a marketing gimmick" 3. The serotonin theo
by ethanbond 3y ago
1. A countervailing meta-analysis does not mean it's "debunked"
2. A theory being debunked does not mean it's "just a marketing gimmick"
3. The serotonin theory being debunked does not mean "chemical imbalance" is totally exonerated
Great article though, thank you for sharing. Here's the paper itself for anyone interested (AFAICT it is oddly not linked in the UCL article?): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35854107/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35854107/
- appleflaxen 3y agoGreat points, but the word exonerated makes no sense in that context.
- ethanbond 3y ago> to clear from accusation or blame Serotonin theory being debunked does not mean “chemical imbalance” is totally cleared from blame Seems clear enough to me, but noted for the future!