4 ms·
A quick note that the "open source" license they use requires activation and license keys that block feature activations in the "open source" software be preser
by whoknowswhat11 3y ago
A quick note that the "open source" license they use requires activation and license keys that block feature activations in the "open source" software be preserved.
This license was popular w folks like apollo who arguably hijacked nearly 700 contributors efforts w a license like this. Because they are using it from start at least that won't be as bad
- folkrav 3y ago> This license was popular w folks like apollo who arguably hijacked nearly 700 contributors efforts w a license like this. Because they are using it from start at least that won't be as bad Which Apollo are you talking about? Only one I know is Apollo GraphQL, and their main server package seems to be MIT, so I must be looking at the wrong thing. What's the story?
- SlickStef11 3y agoApollo GraphQL is not MIT. Their Gateway, federation libraries, and all versions of router are under a Elastic License v2. https://www.apollographql.com/docs/resources/elastic-license-v2-faq/ https://www.apollographql.com/docs/resources/elastic-license...
- folkrav 3y agoAs I mentioned, their main GraphQL server package is[1], so that's where the confusion came from. Thanks. [1] https://github.com/apollographql/apollo-server/blob/9817bc47504597e742948e8c8c2e2b96025c0277/LICENSE https://github.com/apollographql/apollo-server/blob/9817bc47...
- nailer 3y agoIt's not an open source license. Maybe that's why the quotes but let's not indulge them in their lies.