4 ms·
I've been a big fan of this approach for years (introduced to me by Conventional Comments [1]) - even though it may not always be necessary, it's a low-effort w
by orenyk 3y ago
I've been a big fan of this approach for years (introduced to me by Conventional Comments [1]) - even though it may not always be necessary, it's a low-effort way to make sure you're not misunderstood.
[1] https://conventionalcomments.org/ https://conventionalcomments.org/
- ajanuary 3y agoI'd previously tried Conventional Commits but I found the number of labels they suggest too many to keep in my head. The labels in post map well to how I think about comments.
- duringwork12 3y agoThere is a chrome plugin for this that is awesome. I started using it and one of the things i saw is that the amount PR's that I block went down significantly. Because i will classify block or non blocking per issue so don't end deciding at the end based on the amount. So for example something that has 10 nitpicks I will let it pass because all it tells me is i'm a dick :)
- baby_souffle 3y ago> There is a chrome plugin for this that is awesome Link?
- slaughtr 3y agoI’ve had great luck with conventional commits by just ignoring half of them. feat, fix, chore, docs - that’s enough to cover a LOT of cases.
- kmschaal 3y agoThank you for sharing. The example, where the same sentence is presented with different labels, effectively illustrates the essence of the idea.
- duringwork12 3y agoThere is a chrome plugin for this that is awesome
- avgcorrection 3y agoAppreciation: Thanks for pointing out a related project. (This comment was written to adhere to Conventional Message Board Feedback v3.0.0)