3 ms·
It is interesting or ironic that the article's not actually dated (afaict), given the insistence on/fairly unusual and specific style of dating everything that'
by OJFord 3y ago
It is interesting or ironic that the article's not actually dated (afaict), given the insistence on/fairly unusual and specific style of dating everything that's referenced within. 'As of 2002.11' within the text is the only hint I noticed, which doesn't actually mean it was written in November 2002, but in practice probably does (at least that sentence).
- veave 3y agoLast-Modified Sat, 02 Aug 2003 14:27:40 GMT
- isp 3y agoarchive.org has a snapshot from 2002-12-03, as further evidence that it was written on or around 2002-11. https://web.archive.org/web/20021203075817/https://cr.yp.to/djbdns/ipv6mess.html https://web.archive.org/web/20021203075817/https://cr.yp.to/...
- dgellow 3y agoEarliest version in the internet archive is from December 3 2002