4 ms·
It’s not a bad idea, atime, just that our hardware never developed any tech where writes are as cheap as reads. Or even close. I wonder if that’s theoretically
by labster 3y ago
It’s not a bad idea, atime, just that our hardware never developed any tech where writes are as cheap as reads. Or even close. I wonder if that’s theoretically possible.
- eru 3y agoWhen they were coming up with 'atime' and thought it was a good idea, it was because with their tech writes were about as cheap as reads.
- yjftsjthsd-h 3y ago> just that our hardware never developed any tech where writes are as cheap as reads. Or even close. I wonder if that’s theoretically possible. I had it in my head that modern flash actually does read in a way that involves writing, and we just paper over that for the sake of the abstractions we use. Am I wildly misremembering?
- jlokier 3y agoYou might be thinking of DRAM, which does work that way. Reads discharge the memory array capacitance so the data has to be amplified and rewritten.
- bravetraveler 3y agoAs far as I know, reads are reads. Though, writes aren't quite so simple Sometimes blocks may have to be read and re-written elsewhere to make room... and this is what makes using TRIM and having cache on-disk so important.
- yjftsjthsd-h 3y agoOh, I might have gotten it backwards; writes actually involving reads could make sense.